Re: [doc] Proposal to move 10.0 doc files from derby/site to derby/docs [Last call for objections]

[Jean T. Anderson]

Just keep in mind that derby/docs/branches/10.0 just has doc source. The 
pages built from that source are not committed to the svn repo. --This 
is how other apache projects handle forrest-generated stuff.

 -jean
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 5/14/05, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This change is in place and the web site changes are live on
incubator.apache.org/derby . From my poking, it seems stable. Please
report any problems.

Now that we have a real 10.0 doc branch, should I remove the doc set
that's included in the 10.0 code branch? Or should I update it with a
build from the 10.0 doc branch? The 10.0 branch isn't seeing much
action, but I suppose it might be useful to have a set of docs checked
in somewhere in case there happens to be a need to make a 10.0 release
sometime in the future.
Anyone have an opinion on this?
andrew