Hi, >>>>> "DJD" == Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DJD> DJD> Kathey Marsden wrote: DJD> > If you made it this far, I am looking for input on summaries for IRC chats.. DJD> > DJD> > * Is this too much / too little detail. DJD> > * Are the transcripts at all helpful? I think I might drop them if DJD> > they are not useful. DJD> > * Would a weekly summary be better? DJD> DJD> I'm guessing a weekly summary would not be better, there is the DJD> potential for too many subjects to be covered in a single e-mail. DJD> Also assuming you want other people's input on your discussions, a week DJD> lag seems like a bad idea.
I would tend to concur on this. BTW: are your IRC discussions "open" for listening in ;-) ? I would like to see this practice spread.. DJD> DJD> I'm not sure the transcripts are required, depends on the quality of the DJD> summary. I say, do include them, so those who want to dig down, can! I think they have a separate value, too, viz. my hallway comparison in an earlier reply on this item. Thanks, Dag DJD> DJD> Dan. DJD> -- Dag H. Wanvik Sun Microsystems, Web Services, Database Technology Group Haakon VII gt. 7b, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway Tel: x43496/+47 73842196, Fax: +47 73842101 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
