A B (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-121?page=all ] > >A B updated DERBY-121: >---------------------- > > Attachment: derby-121_2.stat > derby-121_2.patch > >Attaching patch to test and resolve this issue. > > Hi Army,
I seem to recall that the client also needed the same change in Reply.java. Could you check that? In the test I think we should rename lob64KTable(bl blob(100M); to something more suited to its size. When you repost your patch could you add a comment that I can use as a check-in comment. Could you also change the bug description to have the correct size instead of 64K? Thanks Kathey
