I forwarded the wrong email to you (sorry) -- you reviewed the correct
doc change. Thanks for catching it!
-jean
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
This looks good. +1 to commit the patch.
The message you forwarded seems to be for another bug. I reviewed
Derby-287 doc change, not the Derby-243 in the 'Original Message'. Hope
this is what you wanted.
Satheesh
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Mamta requested that somebody else review this patch, so I thought I'd
try Kathey's CPR approach (see below) and nag somebody specific --
Satheesh. :-) Of course, Satheesh should feel free to say "nope! sorry
-- can't!"
At any rate, I took a pass through the open doc bugs to see if any can
be cleared out while Jeff is on vacation and DERBY-287 looks like the
only candidate so far.
-jean
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-243) connection toString should
uniquely identify the connection
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:22:00 -0700
From: Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Derby Development <[email protected]>
David Van Couvering wrote:
we really need somebody else to review and test it. So far no
volunteers.
I think I've come to the conclusion that it's a little like they tell
you in CPR training. Instead of "Can somebody call 911?" , you say,
"You, call 911!" Then if they say no you find someone else.
I've abandoned:
"Can someone please review/test this patch?"
in favor of
"<name> , can you please review/test this patch?"
Kathey
