> Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > >> I have briefly looked at the large test... Would it be ok to modify the >> test next week, after the release? The patch corrects the problem being >> reported and I will run the regular tests. I will keep the bug open >> until a test is added here.. > > I'll look into adding the test cases.
I've been adding the setXXX with executeBatch() that currently work with embedded into the parameterMapping test. Seems to work fine on embedded and JCC, but with the Derby client the test just seems to stop after a setByte() and executeBatch() against VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA. So the good thing is the additional testing may have uncovered a bug, the bad thing is I can't check in the test changes until it doesn't cause problems on the client. Dan.
