>>>>>>>>>>>> Myrna van Lunteren wrote (2005-06-09 14:17:51): > On 6/8/05, Bernt M. Johnsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bernt M. Johnsen wrote (2005-05-27 14:31:39): > > > Could anybody review this? > > > > Well? > > > > > This patch will make relative() allowed when the cursor is before > > > first or after last. It will also let absolute(0) be equivalent to > > > beforeFirst(). > > [..snip..] > > Well, well! > I applied the patch without trouble (I feared it would be out of date > already :-) ), built without trouble. It all looks reasonable to me. > However, your patch doesn't include a modified master for scrollCursors2? > Did you run derbyall?
The patch does include changes to scrollCursors2 and I have run derbyall > Could this change create trouble for any existing applications? i.e. What > if someone has programmed an app to do relative(1) in a loop, breaking out > when the exception is hit? That's a problem since JDBC 2.0 and 3.0 is not compatible for this example. I think, anyway, that it's better to be 3.0 compliant than 2.0 compliant. -- Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
