Kathey Marsden wrote: > A B (JIRA) wrote: --------------------- >> >>Oh, I should mention that the patch I created is against the 10.0 branch. I >>think we'll want it to be applied to all branches (10.0, 10.1, and trunk) but >>I don't know if there's a certain order that's supposed to be done. >> >> > > I think typically the order would be to put it in the trunk first and > then 10.1 and 10.0. That way there is no regression caused by the > time lapse of forward porting the fix or risk that it will not be > ported and dead end in the release branch. That said, in an emergency > or if the release branch fix is not appropriate for the long term fix in > the trunk, it seems ok to me to go into the release branch first.
Or if someone has a problem with a specific release and they fix a bug against that release, that's great. Their itch is with the specific branch, 10.0 in this case I would guess. Anyone else who needs the same bug fixed elsewhere, or someone who cares about the overall quality of Derby would integrate the fix to the trunk or another branch. Dan.
