Re: JDBC auto-commit semantics challenge

[Kathey Marsden]

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>I think you dropped the footnotes that you had in the pdf document.
>The note that talked about JDBC 3.0 spec did not mention output
>parameters for auto commit on callable statements.
>
>I would challenge that the text from JDBC 3.0 spec, section 10.1 is the
>definitive behaviour, not the javadoc of setAutoCommit.
>
>  
>
So  does that make that a bug in the setAutoCommit javadoc?  Lance do
you have an opinon here?