Ramandeep Kaur wrote: > Hi, > > I ran code coverage for 10.1.1.0 candidate and the results are as > following: > > EMMA Coverage Report (generated Fri Jun 24 17:56:25 PDT 2005) > > OVERALL COVERAGE SUMMARY > Class % ---------- 89% (1062/1188) > Method % ------- 73% (14688/20201) > Block % --------- 69% (440815/640728)
Thanks for the numbers, Raman. Just to compare Raman's numbers from 2005/4/27 were Class % 90% (1057/1172) Method 73% (14464/19856) Block 69% (431895/629256) http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mostly steady, though it seems 16 new classes were added and only 5 get tested using tests in derbyall. Hopefully Raman can start mailing the details of the coverage available so we could see which new classes were not tested etc. And of course the details we allow us to get to a state where we can trust the results, and ensure that all classes in the report are part of the released jars and only classes in the released jars are included. At least that's my interest in code coverage numbers, others may be interested in other aspects. Dan.
