Philip Wilder wrote: > I've attached an "alpha" patch for the DERBY-213 for anyone who is > interested in the DERBY-213 issue. It should be noted that the patch is > contingent upon our current interpretation of the JDBC > specifications/documentation.
Did we come to a resolution on your document? You asked for challenges and I challenged, but I didn't see any follow up. With a patch like this it is very useful to give an overview of what you are changing, the committers (or any other reviewers) are not mind-readers and it's hard to tell if you are fixing everything to match what is in your current interpretation or just making progress in that direction. Partial fixes are good progress, but it's useful when reviewing them to understand that the patch is only intended to address some of the issues. There have been threads on what makes a patch really useful and likely to be committed quickly, I guess these tips haven't made it to the web-site yet. :-( Dan.
