Dag H. Wanvik wrote: > DJD> There's some inconsistency here, the ResultSet getter methods are > DJD> converting from SQL data types to Java data types. This supportsConvert > DJD> method takes two arguments, both of which describe SQL data types. > > Yes, you are right. Something for Lance to clarify :) > But it would seem the no-args supportsConvert() should return false > until we add support for CONVERT.
And just to be clear, this is the JDBC CONVERT function from section C.5 of JDBC 3.0, correct? I think there is some issue with CONVERT in JDBC 4.0, where the format of the second argument is changing, from INTEGER to SQL_INTEGER or something like that? Dan.
