Hi, Dan. Can you describe in more detail the process you are proposing
here? It sounds like you are suggesting that when someone does a bug
fix, it would be great if it were done in the 10.1 branch *and* the trunk?
Thanks,
David
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
There seem to be quite a few issues logged against the client
DataSource. Do we want to fix these before releasing 10.1?
My thought is "no" but wanted to raise the issue.
I agree with you, the ones Philip is working all have workarounds and
the ones I'm finding are somewhat edge cases. I do think that once they
are fixed they should be put into the 10.1 branch for future releases or
to allow users to get fixed versions. I would like to see more bug fix
activity on the 10.1 branch that occured on the 10.0 branch, to allow
users to get a hold of bug fixes and to present Derby as more responsive
to bugs.
Dan.
