David Van Couvering wrote: >Hi, all. I have received no votes on this in the past two days. Does >this mean I should go ahead and implement this change? > >Thanks, > >David > >David Van Couvering wrote: > > >>Here is an adjusted proposal, taking into account Kathey's *and Dan's* >>comments :) >> >>[ ] VOTE on toString() format for Derby embedded connections >> >>(a) Physical Connections, Pooled Connections (EmbedConnection, >>EmbedConnection30, BrokeredConnection, BrokeredConnection30): >> <classname>@<hashcode> (DATABASE = <dbname>), (SESSIONID = >><sessionid>), (DRDAID = <drdaid>), (XID = <xid>) >> >>Example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>(DATABASE = wombat), (SESSIONID = 1), (DRDAID = null), (XID = 105) >> >>(b) Pooled Connections (EmbedPooledConnection, EmbedXAConnection): >> <classname>@<hashcode> (ID=<uniqueid>), Physical >>Connection=<underlying connection string> >> >>Example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>(ID=2), Physical Connection = >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DATABASE = >>wombat), (SESSIONID = 1), (DRDAID = null), (XID = 105) >> >> >> > > > > I vote +1 on this format.
DB project guidelines are here http://db.apache.org/decisions.html
