This would work too... But if you have long column names, display may get messy by taking too much space. Providing some control to users how their results would look may be useful. I do use maximumDisplayWidth a lot, though a new minimumDisplayWidth may not be that useful.
Satheesh Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > > > >>May be JDBCDisplayUtil could use setMinDisplayWidth() and >>implementation, much like what it already supports using >>setMaxDisplayWidth(). IJ currently uses this setMaxDisplayWidth() to >>support 'maximumDisplayWidth <num>' directive. >> >> > >Or rather than another configuration parameter, just by default make >the column width big enough to display the column's display name. >So the display width would be: > > MAX(column display name width, column width) > >Dan. > > > >>Satheesh >> >>Philip Wilder wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>This is something of a trivial issue but has anyone else ever been >>>irked by the the JDBCDisplayUtil habit of cutting off column names for >>>small columns? I was doing some work today where it was a hinderance >>>and I was wondering if anyone else had ever felt the same way. After >>>looking at the code a change looks like it would be reasonably simple... >>> >>> > > > > > > >
