[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-465?page=all ]
Peter Kovgan updated DERBY-465:
-------------------------------
Attachment: dbbenchmark_multi_user_04_08_2005.zip
Here are last results + updated source code.
According to results Derby is winner(in certain circumstances).
Good luck, folks!
> Embedded Derby-PointBase comparison
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-465
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-465
> Project: Derby
> Type: Wish
> Components: Test
> Versions: 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.0
> Environment: Windows Server 2003, 4 processors, summary CPU 3.00 Ghz, RAM 1
> Gb
> Reporter: Peter Kovgan
> Attachments: Benchmarks_info_independent.doc, DBBenchmarkProject.zip,
> DBOperations.java, Multithreading-access read.doc, User.java,
> dbbenchmark_multi_user_04_08_2005.zip, derby-optimization.doc, derby-pb1.doc
>
> I have tested 4 major embedded DB.
> I have found that major disadvantage of Derby is
> 1)low insert speed and
> 2)significant performance degradation in select, update, delete operation
> speed starting from some table size.
> PointBase in comparison has not such degradation.
> It will be better if you improve your product.
> Good luck and thank you.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
