[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy,Is there a reason why we didn't follow the groupId conventions that I discussed in the email thread "Placing 10.1.1.0 in Maven repository with groupId that follows new policy" ?
I used the name of the main source package as the groupId as I believed that was least likely to change. I'd had some discussion with Brett over Pluto and, to be honest, didn't look back at the Derby thread.
-- Jeremy
