Philip Wilder (JIRA) wrote:

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-213?page=all ]

Philip Wilder updated DERBY-213:
--------------------------------

   Attachment: Derby213patch_Aug112005.patch

An interim patch to bring client in line with embedded. Includes the following 
changes:
- Additional tests in jdbcapi/resultset.java
- Change to special flag to fix a small NullPointerException
- modified output files for resultset.out, updatableResultSet.out, 
holdCursorJDBC30, forupdate.out
- Changes to ResultSet, Statement and Connection in the org.apache.derby.client.am package. These changes have the following effects: * FORWARD_ONLY ResultSets will no longer close implicitly after the last ResultSet has been retrieved. * Checks to see if an auto-commit should be performed have been moved to Statement to mimic embedded functionality.
     * Multiple ResultSets will now auto-commit if all ResultSets are closed if 
auto-commit is turned on.

While the derbyall test suite was run with only one failure (since rectified), 
there are still a couple of issues worthy of consideration.
- Connection.setAutoCommit() java documentation states " In advanced cases, a single 
statement may return multiple results as well as output parameter values. In these cases, 
the commit occurs when all results and output parameter values have been retrieved." 
While my solution auto-commits when all ResultSets have been closed, it does not take 
into consideration output parameters. However, looking at the embedded implementation it 
does not look like embedded takes output parameters into consideration either.
- The SVN patch tool seems to act very strangely for updatableResultSet.out, 
deleting then adding lines that were identical. I cannot account for this 
behavior.
- CallableStatements are a new addition to the resultset.java test class. I 
felt it was an appropriate addition because I was still testing ResultSets 
(albeit multiple ResultSets) but I'm open to alternate suggestions.
- The changes to jdbcapi/resultset.java are not particularly compatible with java 1.3.X as I make reference to change ResultSet holdability in multiple places. This did not appear to cause any problems but it is something to be aware of.

ResultSet.next() after last row of FORWARD_ONLY cursor throws an SQL Exception 
with Network Server
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Key: DERBY-213
        URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-213
    Project: Derby
       Type: Bug
 Components: Network Client
   Versions: 10.1.1.0
   Reporter: Kathey Marsden
   Assignee: Philip Wilder
Attachments: Client.java, Create.java, DERBY-213_6_13_2005.txt, 
DERBY-213_6_9_2005.txt, DERBY-213_irc_6_3_2005, DERBY-213_irc_6_7_2005.txt, 
DERBY-213_irc_6_8_2005, Derby213patch_Aug112005.patch, 
IRCTranscript_June2_2005.txt, ResultSet Outline.pdf, Server.java, resultset.java

Network Server closes the result set if ResultSet.next() is called after the last row of the result set. The test code below throws the following exception.
SQLState:   null
Severity: -99999
Message:  Invalid operation: result set closed
com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.SqlException: Invalid operation: result set closed at com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.ResultSet.checkForClosedResultSet(ResultSet.j
ava:3419)
at com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.ResultSet.nextX(ResultSet.java:290) at com.ibm.db2.jcc.am.ResultSet.next(ResultSet.java:277)
       at AfterLast.test(AfterLast.java:75)
       at AfterLast.main(AfterLast.java:32)
stmt.executeUpdate("CREATE  TABLE TAB ( I INT)");
stmt.executeUpdate("INSERT INTO TAB VALUES(1)");
stmt.executeUpdate("INSERT INTO TAB VALUES(2)");
String sql ="SELECT * from tab";              
ps = conn.prepareStatement(sql);
ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
System.out.println(sql);
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getInt(1));
try {
        System.out.println("one more next");
        rs.next();
                }
   catch (Exception e)
                {
System.out.println("FAIL: next should return false not throw exception");
                e.printStackTrace();
                }

Kathey, when your schedule permits could you give this patch a quick scan and send along any comments to me?

Philip

Reply via email to