On 8/31/05, Philip Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Deepa Remesh (JIRA) wrote: > > > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-518?page=all ] > > > >Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-518: > >------------------------------- > > > > Attachment: derby-518_3.diff > > > >I noticed that my patch became invalid because of a commit in between for > >DERBY-213. > > > >I am submitting a new patch (derby-518_3.diff) with the same set of changes > >except for the following: The test resultset.java is still excluded from > >J2ME. It fails because of additions to the test which use a procedure that > >uses DriverManager. It would be good if this patch can be > >reviewed/committed. The problem with the test in J2ME can be tracked > >separately using DERBY-453. > > > > > > > >>Data type mismatch error for boolean to DECIMAL conversion in J2ME > >>------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> Key: DERBY-518 > >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-518 > >> Project: Derby > >> Type: Bug > >> Components: JDBC > >> Environment: J2ME/CDC/Foundation Profile > >> Reporter: Deepa Remesh > >> Assignee: Deepa Remesh > >> Priority: Minor > >> Fix For: 10.2.0.0, 10.1.1.1 > >> Attachments: derby-518_2.diff, derby-518_2.status, derby-518_3.diff > >> > >>The test jdbcapi/resultset.java gives the following error when run in > >>J2ME/CDC/FP : > >>Testing nullif(?,DECIMAL(10,5)) with setBoolean > >>ERROR XCL12: An attempt was made to put a data value of type 'boolean' into > >>a data value of type 'DECIMAL'. > >>I found that setValue(boolean) is not implemented in BigIntegerDecimal, > >>which is the class used for DECIMAL in J2ME. This is implemented in > >>SQLDecimal and a similar implementation can be provided in > >>BigIntegerDecimal. > >>On looking at the setValue methods in these classes, I also found that > >>setValue(Object) is implemented in SQLDecimal but not in BigIntegerDecimal. > >> > >> > > > > > > > Sorry, Deepa sounds like something I did. Anything I can change to see > that resultset.java is included? > > Philip >
It just happened that we were working on the same set of files :). I am working on some changes to make the resultset test work with J2ME and will post my finding later today to DERBY-453. Please provide suggestions, if any. I would like the fix for DERBY-518 to be in 10.1. Is the fix for DERBY-213 intended for 10.1 branch also? If so, I can wait for your patch to be committed to 10.1. Deepa
