Re: JUnit license, was: subversion etiquette]

[Andrew McIntyre]

On Sep 14, 2005, at 11:40 AM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote: If they are required to be run, then are you providing a single command that executes both derbyall and the junit tests? It would be trivial to write a .java test wrapper to the current harness that runs all the Junit tests, and skips them if them junit isn't in the classpath. That would allow people to write Junit tests, run them concurrently with the current tests, and provide feedback in the current harness' test output if Junit. Yes, you'd still have to update a master for the test wrapper's output. But it would be a step in the right direction, I think, and would at least allow people interested in writing Junit tests to go ahead and start doing that. andrew