Mamta Satoor wrote: > Jeff, I just read your emails about adding a new method > getsTypeFromContext() to avoid jumping hoola hoops with ParameterNode. > It certainly sounds much cleaner than having to implement ParameterNode > specific methods in ValueNode. I would be interested in knowing what Dan > thinks of it too?
Sounds good, the method now (almost) matches the way it is used, rather than overloading isParameterNode for multiple meanings. One small change might be to call the method 'requiresTypeFromContext()' as 'getsTypeFromContext()' could read that the node itself fetches its type from its context. Dan.
