Hello.
I post my questions around shared module.
What is the modules to be shread ?
David shows me the list of modules to be shared in next url.
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/ListOfSharedComponent
However, David justs lists them (At least I recognized as so) and,
I think we need to think about this list in order to make it clear what is the
module to be shared .
At first, I think we should think next :
* Definition of each element in the lists.
And I think what we need to be careful about is as next :
* Is granularity of this list reasonable as shared module ?
* Are there any other elements which should be included in this lists ?
* Is it possible to share the element as the shared module ?
Best regards .
/*
Tomohito Nakayama
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Naka
http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
*/
----- Original Message -----
From: "David W. Van Couvering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: Discussions on Wiki - WAS Re: SQL functions, procedures and PSM -
a possible approach
Hi, Tomohito. It would be great if you could summarize your concerns in
email and we can continue our discussion on the list.
If it would help, I'm also more than open for you and I to have an IRC
conversation, log it, and send the log out to the list. We do seem to
be a bit stuck :)
David
TomohitoNakayama wrote:
Hello.
I understand. Sorry for disturbing .
I had come to feel difficulties in discussing at Wiki.
Should I ask David my question in mailing list once more ?
Best regards.
/*
Tomohito Nakayama
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Naka
http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
*/
----- Original Message ----- From: "David W. Van Couvering"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Discussions on Wiki - WAS Re: SQL functions, procedures and
PSM - a possible approach
I'm getting a little concerned, it feels a little quiet over there in
the corner with Tomohito and I, and I was about to propose with
Tomohito that we move it back to the list.
David
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
David W. Van Couvering wrote:
This sounds great, Dan! Is this a good candidate for putting up on the
Wiki site as a proposal?
Is anyone else concerned by the movement of discussion to the wiki for
the common code stuff? The Apache way is for discussions to occur on the
mailing lists. It seems to me that the wiki is a great way to summarize
such discussions, but not to hold them. A wiki page related to a
discussion can provide a very useful single overview, something that
does get lost in mailings as the discussion spreads out.
Dan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/123 - Release Date: 2005/10/06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/124 - Release Date: 2005/10/07
