HI, RICK. I ALSO AM NOT WILLING TO SEND YOU TO THE STAKE FOR THIS ONE.
IF I WERE TO USE ANT WITHOUT ANY PRVEVIOUS EXPOSURE I WOULD PROBABLY
USE CAPS TOO. SO GO AHEAD AND KEEP IT AS IS!!!!
:)
DAVID
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for vetting my responses. One nub remains:
I will be happy to change my symbol casing if you feel passionately
about this. I think, however, that our existing ant scripts are fairly
poor examples of ant usage. For instance, they do not take advantage of
the -projecthelp machinery and they jump through crazy hoops because
they don't understand custom ant tasks. I think symbol casing is just
one example of ant style and usage which needs improvement across our
scripts. I, however, am not willing to go to the stake for this heresy
and I will defer to your judgment. Please let me know what you think. :)
Cheers,
-Rick
David W. Van Couvering wrote:
2) Concerning the casing of my symbols: I have tried to follow the
same casing policy which I use in Java code. I uppercase constants
and I camelcase variables, arguments, and methods.
I am not sure if the same casing policy applies in Ant, at least I
haven't seen that in the build.xml files we have.
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
