Kathey Marsden wrote: >Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > > >>Deepa Remesh wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>Is there any reason why someone else should not merge this to 10.1? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I don't see any problems in merging this to 10.1 branch. Just that I >>>>was not planning to do it for the 10.1.2 release. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>I just want to add that this patch changes the default location of >>>trace files. It had caused failure in >>>derbynet/getCurrentProperties.java which needed change in test policy >>>file. Patch for this was committed as svn revision 326289. If anyone >>>plans to merge it before I get to it, this revision may also have to >>>be merged along with this patch. >>> >>> >>> >>> >I don't object porting this fix. > >The only concern that might be worth mentioning in consideration to >porting to 10.1 is that this changes the server log file locations and >could potentially require applications to change their policy file if >they allow tracing to be enabled and don't specify derby.system.home. >It is a bug fix to correct the location and probably a fairly low >risk. Anyone object to porting it? > > >
Sorry, trace file locations, not log file.
