Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David W. Van Couvering wrote: >> >> >> Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >> >>> David W. Van Couvering wrote: > >>> >>> Is this a requirement, 'will need', since the wiki page says "We should >>> strive for forward compatibility between major releases, ..." and >>> elsewhere in referring to incompatibility between major releases it says >>> "(and this is to be avoided)"? >>> >> >> Perhaps I misunderstood, but I thought Kathey felt that if we did not >> *guarantee* compatibility then it would be simpler and more correct to >> say that a user should expect and plan for incompatibility between major >> releases, rather than hope and pray for compatibility. >> >> I would prefer to word it something like "may need" instead of "will >> need" but I was concerned about pushback from Kathey :) > > Do you have a link to Kathey's e-mail, I looked in the archives (boy do > I hate the new gui) but couldn't see what you are referring to?
For discussions of this size only Google can help you... I think this was the article: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-VOTE%3A-Shared-Components-Guidelines-p1187186.html -- Knut Anders
