Kathey Marsden wrote: > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > >>Dumb question, should the Eclipse plugins be part of the release >>process? Or are they already? I'm just unclear on why the bug is reopened? >> >> >> > > I am not sure I understand your question so I will just give you more > information than you probably want to know., > > The release process refers to the another document on how to build and > test the eclipse plugin and suggests that "those interested in the > Eclipse plugins will likely volunteer ", so I gave that route a shot and > sure enough Susan volunteered. She posted a zip file and actually > found and fixed an issue. We have to make another release candidate, so > need another zip file, and Susan said she wouldn't mind doing it > again. The issue is reopened so that we can get a new zip file for > the second release candidate.
No, that was useful. So, the question is, I think, does a Derby official release include the Eclipse plugins, or are they separate releases? E.g. do we have a Derby core release and a Derby Eclipse plug-in release? Dan.
