[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13577382#comment-13577382
]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-5546:
--------------------------------------
Yes, I think we should, although it's a corner case it *could* trip some users
seeing this as a feature, not a bug, if they are even aware of it.
> ResultSet#updateBigDecimal on a REAL column does not do underflow checking
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5546
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5546
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC
> Affects Versions: 10.8.2.2
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: derby_triage10_9
> Attachments: derby-5546-2.diff, derby-5546-2.stat, derby-5546.diff,
> derby-5546.stat, MissingUnderflowCheck.java
>
>
> In contrast, ResultSet#updateBigDecimal on a FLOAT or DOUBLE column gives the
> expected error on underflow. Cf. the attached repro program
> MissingUnderflowCheck.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
