[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13592361#comment-13592361
]
Tony Brusseau commented on DERBY-6093:
--------------------------------------
Hi Dag,
I'll see if I can make a reproducible test case. The data is proprietary and
huge, so no real way to give you access to it directly.
Also the bad test case actually used the best indices. Those 2 indices match 8
of the nine literals in the query and should be the preferred way to answer. It
is the fact that it does a table scan on a table with 15m rows, rather than
multiprobing that seems to be the issue here.
I'll also try setting "fe1.arg_0_term = fe2.arg_0_term" to see if it helps.
> dramatically worse query plan for prepared stamement vs calling directly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6093
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Store
> Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
> Environment: Linux
> Reporter: Tony Brusseau
>
> If I run a count query given all the parameters directly, then the query
> executes in .05s, however, if I send it across as a prepared statement, then
> the query takes 40s to run (because is does a complete table scan on a table
> with 15m rows).
> The query looks like:
> SELECT COUNT(*)
> FROM KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe1, KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe2
> WHERE
> (fe1.arg_0_term = 1407374883620920) AND (fe1.arg_num = 1) AND (fe1.arg_term =
> 1407374883574780) AND (fe1.formula_type = 0)
> AND (fe1.formula_id = fe2.formula_id) AND (fe2.arg_0_term = 1407374883620920)
> AND (fe2.arg_num = 2) AND (fe2.arg_term = 1407374883663337) AND
> (fe2.formula_type = 0)
>
> or the prepared version like:
> SELECT COUNT(*)
> FROM KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe1
> , KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe2
> WHERE
> (fe1.arg_0_term = ?) AND (fe1.arg_num = ?) AND (fe1.arg_term = ?) AND
> (fe1.formula_type = ?)
> AND (fe1.formula_id = fe2.formula_id) AND (fe2.arg_0_term = ?) AND
> (fe2.arg_num = ?) AND (fe2.arg_term = ?) AND (fe2.formula_type = ?)
> The table is defined as:
> DROP TABLE KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES;
> CREATE TABLE KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES
> (
> formula_entries_id BIGINT NOT NULL,)
> formula_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
> arg_0_term BIGINT NOT NULL,
> arg_term BIGINT NOT NULL,
> arg_num INTEGER NOT NULL,
> formula_type SMALLINT NOT NULL
> );
> ALTER TABLE kb.formula_entries ADD CONSTRAINT kb_formula_entries_pk PRIMARY
> KEY (formula_entries_id);
> ALTER TABLE kb.formula_entries ADD CONSTRAINT kb_fomula_entries_formula_id_fk
> FOREIGN KEY (formula_id) REFERENCES kb.formula_term (term_id) ON
> DELETE CASCADE;
> CREATE INDEX kb_formula_entries_formula_term_type ON kb.formula_entries
> (arg_term, formula_type);
> CREATE INDEX kb_formula_entries_formula_term_arg0_type ON kb.formula_entries
> (arg_term, arg_0_term, formula_type);
> CREATE INDEX kb_formula_entries_formula_term_num_type ON kb.formula_entries
> (arg_term, arg_num, formula_type);
> CREATE INDEX kb_formula_entries_formula_term_arg0_num_type ON
> kb.formula_entries (arg_term, arg_0_term, arg_num, formula_type);
> *************************************************************************
> The good query plan (when *not* sent as a prepared statements) looks like:
> Tue Feb 26 16:15:21 CST 2013 Thread[DRDAConnThread_5,5,main] (XID =
> 40971291), (SESSIONID = 7), SELECT COUNT(*)
> FROM KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe1, KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe2
> WHERE
> (fe1.arg_0_term = 1407374883620920) AND (fe1.arg_num = 1) AND (fe1.arg_term =
> 1407374883574780) AND (fe1.formula_type = 0)
> AND (fe1.formula_id = fe2.formula_id) AND (fe2.arg_0_term = 1407374883620920)
> AND (fe2.arg_num = 2) AND (fe2.arg_term = 1407374883663337) AND
> (fe2.formula_type = 0) ******* Project-Restrict ResultSet (10):
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 1
> Rows filtered = 0
> restriction = false
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 1.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 7184.99
> Source result set:
> Scalar Aggregate ResultSet:
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows input = 3863
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 7184.99
> Index Key Optimization = false
> Source result set:
> Project-Restrict ResultSet (9):
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3863
> Rows filtered = 0
> restriction = false
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 7184.99
> Source result set:
> Nested Loop Join ResultSet:
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen from the left = 3863
> Rows seen from the right = 3863
> Rows filtered = 0
> Rows returned = 3863
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 7184.99
> Left result set:
> Project-Restrict ResultSet (5):
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3865
> Rows filtered = 2
> restriction = true
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 35.89
> optimizer estimated cost: 6785.98
> Source result set:
> Index Row to Base Row ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES:
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3865
> Columns accessed from heap = {1, 2, 3,
> 4, 5}
> constructor time (milliseconds)
> = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count:
> 35.89
> optimizer estimated cost:
> 6785.98
> Index Scan ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES using index KB_FORMULA_ENTRIES_FORMULA_TERM_TYPE at read
> committed isolation level using instantaneous share row locking chosen by the
> optimizer
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3865
> Rows filtered = 0
> Fetch Size = 16
> constructor time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> open time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> next time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> close time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> next time in
> milliseconds/row = 0
> scan information:
> Bit set of columns
> fetched=All
> Number of columns
> fetched=3
> Number of deleted rows
> visited=0
> Number of pages
> visited=7
> Number of rows
> qualified=3865
> Number of rows
> visited=3866
> Scan type=btree
> Tree height=3
> start position:
> >= on first 2
> column(s).
> Ordered null
> semantics on the following columns:
> 0 1
> stop position:
> > on first 2
> column(s).
> Ordered null
> semantics on the following columns:
> 0 1
> qualifiers:
> None
> optimizer estimated row
> count: 35.89
> optimizer estimated
> cost: 6785.98
> Right result set:
> Project-Restrict ResultSet (8):
> Number of opens = 3863
> Rows seen = 15452
> Rows filtered = 11589
> restriction = true
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 399.01
> Source result set:
> Index Row to Base Row ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES:
> Number of opens = 3863
> Rows seen = 15452
> Columns accessed from heap = {1, 2, 3,
> 4, 5}
> constructor time (milliseconds)
> = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count:
> 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 399.01
> Index Scan ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES using constraint KB_FOMULA_ENTRIES_FORMULA_ID_FK at read
> committed isolation level using instantaneous share row locking chosen by the
> optimizer
> Number of opens = 3863
> Rows seen = 15452
> Rows filtered = 0
> Fetch Size = 16
> constructor time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> open time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> next time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> close time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> next time in
> milliseconds/row = 0
> scan information:
> Bit set of columns
> fetched=All
> Number of columns
> fetched=2
> Number of deleted rows
> visited=0
> Number of pages
> visited=11606
> Number of rows
> qualified=15452
> Number of rows
> visited=19315
> Scan type=btree
> Tree height=3
> start position:
> >= on first 1
> column(s).
> Ordered null
> semantics on the following columns:
> 0
> stop position:
> > on first 1
> column(s).
> Ordered null
> semantics on the following columns:
> 0
> qualifiers:
> None
> optimizer estimated row
> count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated
> cost: 399.01
> *************************************************************************
> The bad query plan (when sent as a prepared statements) looks like:
> Tue Feb 26 16:09:35 CST 2013 Thread[DRDAConnThread_4,5,main] (XID =
> 40971265), (SESSIONID = 5), SELECT COUNT(*)
> FROM KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe1
> , KB.FORMULA_ENTRIES fe2
> WHERE
> (fe1.arg_0_term = ?) AND (fe1.arg_num = ?) AND (fe1.arg_term = ?) AND
> (fe1.formula_type = ?)
> AND (fe1.formula_id = fe2.formula_id) AND (fe2.arg_0_term = ?) AND
> (fe2.arg_num = ?) AND (fe2.arg_term = ?) AND (fe2.formula_type = ?) *******
> Project-Restrict ResultSet (9):
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 1
> Rows filtered = 0
> restriction = false
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 1.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 43.36
> Source result set:
> Scalar Aggregate ResultSet:
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows input = 3863
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 43.36
> Index Key Optimization = false
> Source result set:
> Project-Restrict ResultSet (8):
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3863
> Rows filtered = 0
> restriction = false
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 43.36
> Source result set:
> Nested Loop Join ResultSet:
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen from the left = 3863
> Rows seen from the right = 3863
> Rows filtered = 0
> Rows returned = 3863
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 43.36
> Left result set:
> Index Row to Base Row ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES:
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3863
> Columns accessed from heap = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 2.98
> optimizer estimated cost: 10.89
> Index Scan ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES using index KB_FORMULA_ENTRIES_FORMULA_TERM_ARG0_NUM_TYPE at
> read committed isolation level using instantaneous share row locking chosen
> by the optimizer
> Number of opens = 1
> Rows seen = 3863
> Rows filtered = 0
> Fetch Size = 16
> constructor time (milliseconds)
> = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time in milliseconds/row = > 0
> scan information:
> Bit set of columns fetched=All
> Number of columns fetched=5
> Number of deleted rows visited=0
> Number of pages visited=8
> Number of rows qualified=3863
> Number of rows visited=3864
> Scan type=btree
> Tree height=3
> start position:
> >= on first 4 column(s).
> Ordered null semantics
> on the following columns:
> stop position:
> > on first 4 column(s).
> Ordered null semantics
> on the following columns:
> qualifiers:
> None
> optimizer estimated row count:
> 2.98
> optimizer estimated cost: 10.89
> Right result set:
> Project-Restrict ResultSet (7):
> Number of opens = 3863
> Rows seen = 14922769
> Rows filtered = 14918906
> restriction = true
> projection = true
> constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
> projection time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 32.47
> Source result set:
> Index Row to Base Row ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES:
> Number of opens = 3863
> Rows seen = 14922769
> Columns accessed from heap = {1, 2, 3,
> 4, 5}
> constructor time (milliseconds)
> = 0
> open time (milliseconds) = 0
> next time (milliseconds) = 0
> close time (milliseconds) = 0
> optimizer estimated row count:
> 0.00
> optimizer estimated cost: 32.47
> Index Scan ResultSet for
> FORMULA_ENTRIES using index KB_FORMULA_ENTRIES_FORMULA_TERM_ARG0_NUM_TYPE at
> read committed isolation level using instantaneous share row locking chosen
> by the optimizer
> Number of opens = 3863
> Rows seen = 14922769
> Rows filtered = 0
> Fetch Size = 16
> constructor time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> open time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> next time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> close time
> (milliseconds) = 0
> next time in
> milliseconds/row = 0
> scan information:
> Bit set of columns
> fetched=All
> Number of columns
> fetched=5
> Number of deleted rows
> visited=0
> Number of pages
> visited=34767
> Number of rows
> qualified=14922769
> Number of rows
> visited=14926632
> Scan type=btree
> Tree height=3
> start position:
> >= on first 4
> column(s).
> Ordered null
> semantics on the following columns:
> stop position:
> > on first 4
> column(s).
> Ordered null
> semantics on the following columns:
> qualifiers:
> None
> optimizer estimated row
> count: 0.00
> optimizer estimated
> cost: 32.47
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
