>>>>> "SF" == Stephen Fitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SF> Øystein Grøvlen wrote:
>> (Connecting without specifying StorageFactory
>> should just use whatever has been booted.)
>>
SF> 3. If a StorageFactory exists and a connection is attempted WITHOUT
SF> specifying a StorageFactory, and the StorageFactory in use is NOT the
SF> default (DirStorageFactory), throw an Exception. I think this would
SF> be preferred behavior because if you connected with just
SF> jdbc:derby:dbname you would assume it would be using the default
SF> StorageFactory.
I do not agree on this. I would like to separate the concerns so that
an application does not need to be rewritten to work with different
storage factories. A special client can be used to boot the database
with the desired StorageFactory.
--
Øystein
