Hi Rick - My mistake with the package name requirement with 10.8. VTIs still need to reside in "com.ibm.db2j". I'm surprised because from memory I thought that was no longer the case... - maybe the restriction had only omitted by mistake with some re-factoring in an intermediary version..
Thank you for the context handle tip.. I'll give that a go for now to try and get the info we need. I'll raise a feature request for more info to be passed through "officially" in future too - perhaps via an extensible structure.. e.g. HashMap<key->Object> where keys are constants on some class and can be added easily between releases... Unfortunately we have no way to solve the rigid "static table shape" issue yet... Regards David -- View this message in context: http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/Limitations-of-Table-Functions-vs-old-VTIs-tp127988p128121.html Sent from the Apache Derby Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
