Dag Wanvik <[email protected]> writes: > Note: there is no CP2 version of the JDBC3 data sources, that is, we > have only "40"-full names (for the client, similarly for embedded): > > BasicClientConnectionPoolDataSource40.java > BasicClientDataSource40.java > BasicClientXADataSource40.java > > so we would possibly have to introduce "40"-less variants.
Adding aliases might make the naming more consistent. However, I'd rather not introduce a new set of data source classes until we have new functionality to put into them. That would mean more public interfaces that we would need to support for a long time, and it would require more testing to verify that all variants work, for little added value. Thanks, -- Knut Anders
