[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13645234#comment-13645234
]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-6160:
--------------------------------------
I see all of the permissions above are listed as optional (not mandatory), so
in that sense it would be ok to omit them; but I think it will be better to
include them in example, since omitting them could cause user grievance. Better
to add them and add a comment that the user can omit this if she is sure they
won't be needed due to the way the application is run (e.g. no Connection abort
is ever attemped).
> Fixes needed to documentation topics on security policy permissions
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6160
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0, 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Attachments: DERBY-6160-2.diff, DERBY-6160-2.stat, DERBY-6160-2.zip,
> DERBY-6160.diff, DERBY-6160.stat, DERBY-6160.zip
>
>
> DERBY-5363 added a new required permission RuntimePermission
> "accessUserInformation".
> This should be added to the developer guide information under granting
> permissions to Derby.
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Derby-docs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/out/devguide/cdevbabejgjd.html
> I am not sure of the context under which it is required if it is just needed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
