[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13657043#comment-13657043
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-6207:
----------------------------------
The template.policy looks great, Dag -- +1. I did not look as closely at the
server.policy (the one that is not in the docs), since I am not sure what its
contents should be, but it looks good too.
There are a few differences in line breaks between this patch and the
DERBY-6160 one -- those don't matter, I think. (They are lines that I shortened
to make the content fit in the PDF, which has narrow margins.)
However, I think I will reopen DERBY-6160 to fix a few formatting
inconsistencies in comment characters and also to remove the clause about Java
SE 5, since that will be obsolete soon anyway and it saves us another piece of
cleanup later.
> Update policy files in java/drda/org/apache/derby/drda
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6207
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Demos/Scripts
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Kim Haase
> Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: derby-6207-a.diff, derby-6207-a.status
>
>
> The java/drda/org/apache/derby/drda/template.policy and
> java/drda/org/apache/derby/drda/server.policy files both include the
> following line, which I understand is no longer needed:
> permission java.util.PropertyPermission "derby.storage.jvmInstanceId",
> "write";
> It should be removed from both.
> Possibly the template.policy file, which is used as the JDK
> demos/db/templates/server.policy file, should have some further changes to
> reflect current recommendations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
