[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662900#comment-13662900
 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik edited comment on DERBY-6179 at 5/21/13 11:23 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Haven't seen this this lately. Probably Knut's killing off old processes in the 
test lab solved the issue, so closing this for now. I'll leave this code in 
place in case since it makes the test more robust. 
                
      was (Author: dagw):
    Haven't seen this this lately. Probably Knut's killing off old processes in 
the test lab solved the issue, so closing this for now. I'll leave this codein 
place in case since it makes the test more robust. 
                  
> Insert some guarding code into the first replication test to check port 
> availability
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6179
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6179
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Replication, Test
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
>         Attachments: replscratch.diff, replscratch.status
>
>
> We have seen lots of noise in the nightlies with replication failing. It 
> seems that often it fails due to ports being unavailable, possibly due to 
> earlier (failed) runs.
> This JIRA issue tracks diagnostic code I want to insert to see what's 
> happening at test run time.
> The diagnostic code can be removed when we have stabilized the tests.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to