+1 Thanks, Lily
On May 30, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/30/13 9:23 AM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rick Hillegas <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I agree with Knut that this is a procedural issue which could be >> handled by a lazy consensus vote: >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html . Although we've been >> discussing the topic for a couple days, we haven't done so under >> the aegis of a formal vote. Thanks to Myrna for offering to call >> the lazy consensus vote and then file the INFRA issue afterward. >> The vote will only add 72 hours of delay to the process. >> >> Thanks, >> -Rick >> >> >> It's not actually clear to me whether for a lazy consensus vote on a >> procedural issue, you should include 'vote' in the subject, but I did - I >> now officially state that if no one objects within 3 days, I'll go ahead and >> log a JIRA issue for INFRA to implement the svn/jira changes described on >> http://www.apache.org/dev/svngit2jira.html. >> >> Note that this will only apply to commits going forward. Mike did ask infra >> about going backwards, and they came back with the following: >> "Someone should be able to whip up a script to >> retroactively update jiras with commit information by adding comments... >> >> I don't think infra needs to be involved in this, even, except perhaps >> if the script author will accidentally get himself banned for abuse." >> >> So if someone wants to figure out how to make such a script please >> volunteer, for now this will only affect commits going forward. >> >> Myrna > +1
