Sounds like we're in violent agreement :)
David
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
David W. Van Couvering wrote:
- I don't think we need to do anything extreme like yanking the support
for JCC out of the harness, I think that would be somewhat silly and
unhelpful.
Not sure why we would ever do anything like that. If someone contributed
changes to the harness that, say, made it easy to run hibernate based
tests that would be great. Adding functionality to the harness (or
elsewhere) to allow improved testing should be encouraged.
Of course you would probably be insane to attempt improving the current
harness instead of starting afresh with JUnit tests. :-) But the
principle still stands.
Dan.
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
