[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13685785#comment-13685785
 ] 

Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-6066:
----------------------------------------

Yes, I will go ahead and resolve this. For anyone interested, this can be back 
ported to earlier releases if needed
                
> Client should use a prepared statement rather than regular statement for 
> Connection.getTransactionIsolation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6066
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network Client
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>            Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
>             Fix For: 10.10.1.1
>
>         Attachments: DERBY6066_patch1_diff.txt, DERBY6066_patch2_diff.txt, 
> SampleProgram.java
>
>
> This jira is similar to DERBY-6053 but for 
> o.a.d.client.am.Connection.getTransactionIsolation. Use prepared statement 
> rather than regular statement every time user makes a get transaction 
> isolation call.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to