As I understand it the value of TINYINT is:
- Enables of migration of applications to Derby
- Allows for better use of storage (which goes in line with our "small
footprint" goal)
The reason against it is it is a non-standard SQL type. But don't we
already have things in Derby that are not part of the SQL standard?
Thanks,
David
Lance J. Andersen wrote:
Yeah, that's the same sentence I saw. It's a bit oddly worded. The
"8-bit integer value" makes it sound like a byte. But "value between 0
and 255 that may be signed or unsigned" could mean a "value between
-256 and 255", that is, a 9-bit quantity. I'm putting my faith in the
8-bit part.
So it seems there would be two choices:
-128 to 127 :
+ matches JDBC 3.0 mapping to a byte (tables B.1/B.2)
- does not match SQL Server, Sybase
0 to 255 :
+ matches SQL Server, Sybase
- does not match JDBC 3.0 mapping to a byte
Hmmmm, that's kind of an awkward place to be in. It seems you want to
add this non-standard SQL type to match other databases, but by matching
the other databases you break the JDBC spec. :-)
I do not see how this is going to break anything. The JDBC spec
indicates should, not "must".
As the other doc points out you could use either a short or a byte based
on your needs.
setbyte() will work if the value is in range for the database which
means it has to be non-negative for TINYINT in the case of Sybase.
setShort() will also work for a TINYINT as long as the value is in range.
So i guess i am not sure of your concern dan. This datatype has worked
fine for drivers which have supported Sybase and MS SQL server for years.
Assuming there is agreement to add TINYINT, i would add it to be
compatible with Sybase and MS SQL Server.
MySQL seems to claim both ranges, but I didn't look to see how you
specifiy signed vs. unsigned. Given MySQL's type handling in other areas
I'm not sure they a a good "reference" implementation.
Rick, you also, I think, said in one e-mail that Postgres supports
TINYINT, I've only been able to find information that Postgres does not
support TINYINT, do you have a link?
Dan.
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard