Bryan Pendleton <[email protected]> writes: > I've made significant use of the automated Emma test runs at: > http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/index.html > and I'm grateful to the community members who provide this resource. > > I wonder; given that the Emma tool appears to have fallen into > disrepair, whether the automated tool could be switched to use > the JaCoCo tool instead?
Hi Bryan, I'm looking into setting up automatic runs with JaCoCo and have a partially working setup. The EMMA runs use multiple JVMs to cover all JDBC drivers and optional modules, but I've only set up JaCoCo with Java 7 for now. I think the results are useful nevertheless, so I'll see if I can get them published to some public server in their current shape, and hopefully I can improve them by adding more JVMs later. > Based on Kristian's notes in DERBY-5817 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5817 > I created a simple wiki page with some notes on running tests > using JaCoCo: > https://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/CodeCoverageWithJaCoCo > > It would be nice to have regular results that we could link > to and periodically examine, using a testing tool which was > more reliable and up-to-date than the Emma tool. > > Is there somebody in the community who could pursue this? > > thanks, > > bryan -- Knut Anders
