[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13705632#comment-13705632
 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6291:
-------------------------------------------

I think this class was covered by the GSoC project last year in DERBY-5854.

Unfortunately, since many of the methods in BrokeredCallableStatement are not 
actually implemented and always throw an SQLException, they won't show up in 
the coverage reports. See DERBY-5851 and 
http://sourceforge.net/p/eclemma/discussion/614869/thread/756af8ff for details.
                
> Improve code coverage of  org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6291
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: JDBC
>            Reporter: ahsan shamsudeen
>            Assignee: ahsan shamsudeen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> According to code coverage analysis, 
> org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement is 
> exercised poorly by of our regression tests. The current coverage report for 
> this class can be found at 
> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/_files/a9.html
> This task is to investigate this class, and either remove the unused code, or 
> add
> regression test that exercise the code, as appropriate.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to