[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13714799#comment-13714799
]
ahsan shamsudeen commented on DERBY-6291:
-----------------------------------------
The following methods are passed the test with above change.
public final Blob getBlob(int i) {}
public final Clob getClob(int i) {}
public final Array getArray(int i) {}
But , some similar type of methods didn't get passed by above change.They
failed with "junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: should have failed " . So, I
just remove the fail("should have failed") statement and run the test suite.
The following methods are passed the test. But, I didn't understand the logic
behind this.
public final String getString(int parameterIndex){}
public final boolean getBoolean(int parameterIndex){}
public final byte getByte(int parameterIndex) {}
> Improve code coverage of org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6291
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6291
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: JDBC
> Reporter: ahsan shamsudeen
> Assignee: ahsan shamsudeen
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: derby_triage10_11
> Attachments: DERBY-6291.patch, setIntPatch.txt,
> UPDATED-DERBY-6291.patch
>
>
> According to code coverage analysis,
> org.apache.derby.iapi.jdbc.BrokeredCallableStatement is
> exercised poorly by of our regression tests. The current coverage report for
> this class can be found at
> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/_files/a9.html
> This task is to investigate this class, and either remove the unused code, or
> add
> regression test that exercise the code, as appropriate.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
