[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13734366#comment-13734366
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-6307:
----------------------------------------
Hi Ahsan,
You should have a look through DERBY-3176 to get some history about the JVMInfo
class.
I think we should try adding some tests in
org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.tools.SysinfoAPITest
Can you try just adding:
import org.apache.derby.iapi.services.info.JVMInfo;
and then add some test cases that directly invoke the methods in JVMinfo?
The first test to add is just something like:
assertTrue(
JVMInfo.JDK_ID == JVMInfo.J2SE_16 ||
JVMInfo.JDK_ID == JVMInfo.J2SE_17 ||
JVMInfo.JDK_ID == JVMInfo.J2SE_18 );
> Improve the code coverage of org.apache.derby.iapi.services.info.JVMInfo
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6307
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6307
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Test
> Reporter: ahsan shamsudeen
> Assignee: ahsan shamsudeen
> Priority: Minor
>
> According to the coverage reports,
> org.apache.derby.iapi.services.info.JVMInfo is poorly exercised by the Derby
> regression tests.
> This sub-task is to improve that test coverage.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
