[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13765953#comment-13765953
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on DERBY-6127:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1522744 from [~chaase3] in branch 'docs/branches/10.10'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1522744 ]

DERBY-6127  Tell users to make sure that the state of a user-defined aggregate 
needs to be serializable 

Merged patch DERBY-6127.diff to 10.10 doc branch from trunk revision 1522740.
                
> Tell users to make sure that the state of a user-defined aggregate needs to 
> be serializable
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6127
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6127
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6127.diff, DERBY-6127.stat, DERBY-6127.zip
>
>
> The Reference Manual section on "CREATE DERBY AGGREGATE statement" should 
> tell users to make sure that all of the state of their user-defined aggregate 
> is really serializable. This is because the Aggregator interface extends 
> java.io.Serializable. A user-defined aggregate may end up being serialized to 
> disk when performing grouped aggregation over a large number of groups. That 
> is, intermediate results may be serialized to disk for a query like the 
> following. The serialization will fail if the user-defined aggregate contains 
> non-serializable fields:
>   select a, myAggregate( b ) from myTable group by a

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to