[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13785193#comment-13785193
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on DERBY-6367:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1528862 from [~chaase3] in branch 'docs/branches/10.10'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1528862 ]

DERBY-6367  Reference Manual incorrectly states that you can't schema-qualify 
constraint names

Merged patch DERBY-6367.diff to 10.10 doc branch from trunk revision 1528851.

> Reference Manual incorrectly states that you can't schema-qualify constraint 
> names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6367
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6367.diff, rrefconstraintname.html
>
>
> The Reference Manual section titled "constraint-Name" incorrectly states that 
> you can't schema-qualify the names of constraints. This is not true. What is 
> true is that the schema name, if supplied, must be the same as the table's 
> schema name. This behavior of Derby is correct and conforms to the SQL 
> Standard, part 2, section 11.6 (table constraint definition), syntax rule 2. 
> The following script shows Derby's behavior:
> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;create=true';
> create schema s1;
> -- fails
> create table t1
> (
>     a int,
>     constraint s1.c1 check ( a > 0 )
> );
> -- succeeds
> create table t2
> (
>     a int,
>     constraint c2 check ( a > 0 )
> );
> -- succeeds
> create table t3
> (
>     a int,
>     constraint app.c3 check ( a > 0 )
> );
> -- fails because the name conflicts with an existing constraint name
> create table t4
> (
>     a int,
>     constraint c3 check ( a > 0 )
> );



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to