[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13789724#comment-13789724
]
Mike Matrigali commented on DERBY-6352:
---------------------------------------
I don't think the comments match the actions of the patch, I think
what the patch is doing:
if sane thow an assert which will cause system to shut down, it will not "go
on".
In the insane case we will just do a javadump, with nothing in derby.log
indicating
why.:
+ // if sane, print out a warning.
+ // if insane, if this is an IBM jvm, force a jvm dump
+ // so we can analyze.
+ // either way, go on, and hope things get cleared away
+ // automatically in due course
+ if (SanityManager.DEBUG)
+ {
+ SanityManager.THROWASSERT("unexpectedly needing an
extra permission.");
+ ace.printStackTrace();
+ }
+ if (JVMInfo.isIBMJVM()) {
+ JVMInfo.javaDump();
+ }
> Access denied ("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "modifyThread") in
> store.RecoveryAfterBackup test
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6352
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6352
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Environment: IBM java 7 Derby version 10.10.1.2 - (1494414)
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Attachments: DERBY-6352_trunk.diff
>
>
> I got a report of the following intermittent (6/60) exception in
> store.RecoveryAfterBackupTest.
> Exception in thread "main" java.security.AccessControlException: Access
> denied ("java.lang.RuntimePermission" "modifyThread")
> at
> java.security.AccessController.throwACE(AccessController.java:100)
> at
> java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:174)
> at
> java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:549)
> at
> java.lang.SecurityManager.checkAccess(SecurityManager.java:676)
> at java.lang.Thread.checkAccess(Thread.java:459)
> at java.lang.Thread.interrupt(Thread.java:588)
> at
> org.apache.derby.iapi.services.context.ContextService$1.run(Unknown Source)
> at
> java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:274)
> at
> org.apache.derby.iapi.services.context.ContextService.notifyAllActiveThreads(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.derby.impl.services.monitor.BaseMonitor.shutdown(Unknown Source)
> at org.apache.derby.jdbc.InternalDriver.connect(Unknown Source)
> at org.apache.derby.jdbc.Driver20.connect(Unknown Source)
> at org.apache.derby.jdbc.AutoloadedDriver.connect(Unknown
> Source)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:571)
> at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:233)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.TestUtil.getConnection(TestUtil.java:836)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.store.RecoveryAfterBackup.main(RecoveryAfterBackup.java:82)
> modifyThread is a necessary permission if interrupting a thread other than
> the current thread but is not in our policy file for derby.jar.
> The relevant code in ContextService is:
> for (ContextManager cm : allContexts) {
> Thread active = cm.activeThread;
> if (active == me)
> continue;
> if (active == null)
> continue;
> final Thread fActive = active;
> if (cm.setInterrupted(c))
> {
> AccessController.doPrivileged(
> new PrivilegedAction<Void>() {
> public Void run() {
> fActive.interrupt();
> return null;
> }
> });
> }
>
> I am not sure why this has never come up before. Are we expecting in this
> context that fActive is the current thread?
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
