Rick Hillegas wrote: > Here is a possible solution to the versioned message id problem: > > [snip details ...]
> o The Derby build can create message files whose names contain the > current value of DERBY_VERSION. > [snip more details]... If the derby build is going to create extra message files, why not one for server and one for client with different names. All that has to be encoded in the message id is whether it is client, server or both. Then there is no versioning worries I think. No?
