[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-6383:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY6383_patch1_diff.txt

Attaching a patch to fix the issue. We were incorrectly marking the statement 
trigger to fire for all the columns on the table rather than the ones 
identified by the CREATE TRIGGER statement. Next, I will add a junit test and 
also an upgrade test. But in the meantime, please let me know if there are any 
comments.

> Update trigger defined on one column fires on update of other columns
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6383
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.7.1.4, 10.8.1.2, 10.9.1.0, 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Attachments: d6383.sql, DERBY6383_patch1_diff.txt
>
>
> I see this problem on 10.8 and higher. To reproduce, create a database with a 
> trigger like this:
> connect 'jdbc:derby:trigdb;create=true';
> create table t1(x int, y int);
> create table t2(x int, y int);
> create trigger tr after update of x on t1 referencing old table as old insert 
> into t2 select * from old;
> Then run dblook on the database, and you'll see the following output:
> -- ----------------------------------------------
> -- DDL Statements for triggers
> -- ----------------------------------------------
> CREATE TRIGGER "APP"."TR" AFTER UPDATE OF "X", "Y" ON "APP"."T1" REFERENCING 
> OLD_TABLE AS OLD FOR EACH STATEMENT insert into t2 select * from old;
> Notice that the DDL creates an update trigger for columns X and Y, whereas 
> the original trigger was defined on column X only.
> I see the expected DDL on 10.7.1.1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to