[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-532:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: derby-532-fix-metadata-1.status
                derby-532-fix-metadata-1.diff

Here is one fallout of running the regressions with default constraint mode 
deferrable.

Uploading a patch that fixes broken database metadata for deferred constraint 
indexes: the metadata query used the method IndexDescriptor#isUnique to 
determine logical uniqueness, but it really represents physical uniqueness now. 
For deferred unique constraints, the method that should be used is 
"isUniqueDeferrable". Added a test, and also added client/server run of the 
regression test for deferred constraints. 

Before the fix, the added test fixture "testDatabaseMetaData" failed in that 
the index in question was identified as non unique, but it is logically unique.


> Support deferrable constraints
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-532
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-532
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Jörg von Frantzius
>            Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
>              Labels: derby_triage10_11
>         Attachments: IndexDescriptor.html, IndexDescriptorImpl.html, 
> IndexRowGenerator.html, SortObserver.html, deferredConstraints.html, 
> deferredConstraints.html, deferredConstraints.html, deferredConstraints.html, 
> deferredConstraints.html, derby-532-fix-metadata-1.diff, 
> derby-532-fix-metadata-1.status, derby-532-import-1.diff, 
> derby-532-import-1.status, derby-532-import-2.diff, derby-532-import-3.diff, 
> derby-532-import-3.status, derby-532-more-tests-1.diff, 
> derby-532-more-tests-1.stat, derby-532-post-scan-1.diff, 
> derby-532-post-scan-1.stat, derby-532-post-scan-2.diff, 
> derby-532-post-scan-2.stat, derby-532-post-scan-3.diff, 
> derby-532-post-scan-3.stat, derby-532-post-scan-4.diff, 
> derby-532-post-scan-4.stat, derby-532-serializable-scan-1.diff, 
> derby-532-serializable-scan-2.diff, derby-532-serializable-scan-2.stat, 
> derby-532-syntax-binding-dict-1.diff, derby-532-syntax-binding-dict-1.status, 
> derby-532-syntax-binding-dict-2.diff, derby-532-syntax-binding-dict-2.status, 
> derby-532-syntax-binding-dict-all-1.diff, 
> derby-532-test-with-default-deferrable-all-over.diff, 
> derby-532-testAlterConstraintInvalidation.diff, 
> derby-532-testAlterConstraintInvalidation.status, derby-532-unique-pk-1.diff, 
> derby-532-unique-pk-1.status, derby-532-unique-pk-2.diff, 
> derby-532-unique-pk-3.diff, derby-532-unique-pk-3.status, 
> derby-532-xa-1.diff, derby-532-xa-2.diff, derby-532-xa-3.diff, 
> derby-532-xa-3.status
>
>
> In many situations it is desirable to have constraints checking taking place 
> only at transaction commit time, and not before. If e.g. there is a chain of 
> foreign key constraints between tables, insert statements have to be ordered 
> to avoid constraint violations. If foreign key references are circular, the 
> DML has to be split into insert statements and subsequent update statements 
> by the user.
> In other words, with deferred constraints checking, life is much easier for 
> the user. Also it can create problems with softwares such as 
> object-relational mapping tools that are not prepared for statement ordering 
> and thus depend on deferred constraints checking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to