[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13836556#comment-13836556
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-5901:
-------------------------------------------
There's also the question what to do with the ambiguous function names in
triggers, views, generation clauses and similar, where we store the original
SQL text in system tables. Currently, they will resolve to whatever was the
correct function at some ill-defined point in time (such as the last time the
trigger SPS was recompiled). They should resolve to whatever was the correct
function at definition time.
DERBY-6362 has some code attached to it, which replaces unqualified identifiers
with schema-qualified identifiers in CHECK constraints before storing them.
Although it's not the primary purpose of DERBY-6362, it has the nice side
effect that CHECK constraints will preserve the schema that the function
resolved to at the time the constraint was created. I think that code is
general enough to be used in triggers, views and generation clauses as well.
> You can declare user-defined functions which shadow builtin functions by the
> same name.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5901
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5901
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Labels: derby_triage10_10
>
> You can override a Derby builtin function by creating a function with the
> same name. This can give rise to wrong results.
> Consider the following user code:
> public class FakeSin
> {
> public static Double sin( Double input ) { return new Double( 3.0 ); }
> }
> Now run the following script:
> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;create=true';
> values sin( 0.5 );
> create function sin( a double ) returns double language java parameter style
> java no sql external name 'FakeSin.sin';
> values sin( 0.5 );
> values sin( 0.5 );
> Note the following:
> 1) The first invocation of sin() returns the expected result.
> 2) You are allowed to create a user-defined function named "sin" which can
> shadow the builtin function.
> 3) The second invocation of sin() returns the result of running the builtin
> function. This is because the second invocation is character-for-character
> identical to the first, so Derby just uses the previously prepared statement.
> 4) But the third invocation of sin() returns the result of running the
> user-defined function. Note that the third invocation has an extra space in
> it, which causes Derby to compile it from scratch, picking up the
> user-defined function instead of the builtin one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
