Can Derby temp tables span transactions? Øystein Grøvlen wrote:
"SB(" == Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA) <[email protected]> writes:SB(> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-720?page=comments#action_12358063 ] SB(> Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-720:SB(> ----------------------------------------- SB(> I think Derby shouldn't allow compress on synonyms... Synonym usage is valid only in DML operations. If no one objects, I can make compress ignore synonyms, like views. While I am there, I can also make it ignore temp. tables... This may be a good (short term) solution. SB(> I will also mark Derby-365 a duplicate of this bug. I my opinion, it is seldom a good idea to ignore an operation. Either one should execute the operation or the caller should be told (usually by an exception) than this operation will not be performed.
