[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13926246#comment-13926246
]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-6478:
--------------------------------------
Thanks, Kim. Looks good. I see the current version recommends Basic data
sources for Compact Profile 3.
Since only CP2 *needs* the Basic versions, I think we should recommend the full
versions for CP3 (as well as for SE), since the Basic versions have less
functionality in that they do include JNDI support.
> Fix language about supported DataSources for Compact Profiles
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6478
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6478
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
> Reporter: Kim Haase
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.11.0.0
>
> Attachments: DERBY-6478-2.diff, DERBY-6478-2.zip, DERBY-6478-3.diff,
> DERBY-6478-3.zip, DERBY-6478.diff, DERBY-6478.stat, DERBY-6478.zip
>
>
> Knut Anders Hatlen pointed out the following in his review of a patch for
> DERBY-6236:
> "One little inaccuracy in the changed text (existing problem, not introduced
> by the patch): It seems to imply that only the basic data sources work on
> Compact Profile 3. That is not the case. The ordinary data sources are
> supported on CP3. Only CP2 lacks the necessary classes (javax.naming.*) and
> need the basic data sources. (The basic data sources do work on CP3, though,
> so it's not a problem if applications choose to use them if they don't need
> the extra functionality of the ordinary data sources.)"
> This means that numerous topics in the Admin Guide, Reference Manual, and
> Developer's Guide probably need some fixes. For example, the topic "JDBC
> support for Java SE 8 Compact Profiles" in the Reference Manual should
> probably add something like the following at the end of the topic:
> "Users of Compact Profile 3 on the Java SE 8 platform can use either these
> DataSource classes or the Datasource classes for the full Java SE platform."
> As another example, the topic "Network client security" in the Admin Guide
> should probably be changed to something like this:
> "Derby provides two ClientDataSource implementations. Use the
> org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDataSource class on all supported Java SE
> versions except Java SE 8 Compact Profiles 1 and 2. On Java SE 8 Compact
> Profile 2, use the org.apache.derby.jdbc.BasicClientDataSource40 class."
> Please let me know if these tweaks need further tweaking -- in the meantime I
> will start work on implementing them. Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
